Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of the participants according to GDM status

From: Maternal vitamin D status and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in twin pregnancies: a longitudinal twin pregnancies birth cohort study

Variables

No GDM

(n = 218)

GDM

(n = 93)

P-value

Age, years

29.0 ± 3.9

30.0 ± 3.9

0.031

Age ≥ 35 y, n (%)

16 (7.3)

17 (18.3)

0.004

Education > 12 years, n (%)

163 (74.8)

68 (73.1)

0.760

Employed, n (%)

163 (74.8)

70 (75.3)

1.000

Prepregnancy BMI, kg/m2

21.3 ± 2.9

22.5 ± 3.2

0.002

Prepregnancy BMI ≥ 24 kg/m2, n (%)

37 (17.0)

25 (26.9)

0.045

Primipara, n (%)

156 (71.6)

71 (76.3)

0.384

Conception with ART, n (%)

79 (36.2)

40 (43.0)

0.261

Monochorionic twins, n (%)

88 (40.4)

40 (43.0)

0.664

Smoking before pregnancy, n (%)

8 (3.7)

6 (6.5)

0.279

Family history of diabetes, n (%)

8 (3.7)

5 (5.4)

0.491

Gestational age of sampling, wk

24.2 ± 1.0

24.3 ± 0.8

0.124

Season of sampling

  

0.338

Summer/autumn, n (%)

90 (41.3)

33 (35.5)

 

Winter/spring, n (%)

128 (58.7)

60 (64.5)

 

25(OH)D concentrations, ng/mL

32.5 ± 11.4

27.8 ± 9.9

< 0.001

Sufficiency (≥ 30 ng/mL), n (%)

139 (63.8)

41 (44.1)

0.002

Insufficiency (20–30 ng/mL), n (%)

40 (18.4)

33 (35.5)

 

Deficiency (< 20 ng/mL), n (%)

39 (17.9)

19 (20.4)

 
  1. ART assistant reproductive technology, BMI body mass index, GDM gestational diabetes mellitus